SHOW: CNN Crossfire
HEADLINE: FTC to Set up List to Block Telemarketer Calls
BYLINE: Tucker Carlson, Paul Begala
BODY:
BEGALA:
Washington regulators want to help you get rid of pesky calls from
telemarketers. The Federal Trade Commission wants to set up a list that
you can put your name on to block 80 percent of those unwanted calls.
They often come during dinner time or worse, during CROSSFIRE. But to
do so the Feds need $16 million to get started, and Republican
Congressman Billy Tauzin the chairman of the committee involved says
hold the phone.
He's worried that the FTC's crackdown may
duplicate efforts under way by the FCC and other agencies in
Washington. In Chicago, Robert
Bulmash, the president and founder of
Private Citizen and the author of a 39-page book called "So You Want to
Sue a Telemarketer". And here in Washington, Fred Smith,
president and founder of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
CARLSON:
Mr. Bulmash, it's hard for me to believe and I didn't even know until
today that at this point in American history when the country is under
siege from foreign threats, from terrorism. There are people who really
believe the federal government ought to spend millions of dollars, not
to mention energies protecting people from telemarketers. Doesn't
strike me as a huge threat.
ROBERT BULMASH, PRES. &
FOUNDER, PRIVATE CITIZEN: It doesn't have to be a foreign threat to be
invading our homes. We have a right to be left alone. We
have a right
to be left alone some place. And if that right doesn't exist at
least
in our homes that right doesn't exist at all in America. We're
people.
We're human beings. We're not walking wallets. And that's
how the
telenuisance industry is treating us.
CARLSON: Do you have
evidence? I mean, have people been killed by telemarketers? No, let me
ask you a real question and that is. In this age when people have
caller I.D. among other things, when there are electronic ways for the
individual, the individual citizen to repel telemarketers why should
the federal government get involved?
BULMASH: Because first of
all, I estimated that over $2 billion a year is spent by residents with
telephone companies to get Caller I D,
unlisted numbers, privacy manager, call intercept services. It's like
an arms war. The telephone companies are selling equipment and
phone
numbers to the telenuisance industry, and then they're selling
residents equipment in order to block the calls that are helped along
by the telephone companies. Everybody's making money off of this
and we
are losing our privacy. Our right to be left alone.
BEGALA:
Thank you. It's always good to see you. One of the things I love about
you is you're not afraid to defend the indefensible. Telenuisance, I
love that phrase that Robert has just coined...How many of you think
these telenuisance guys are a huge pain in the ass? We're swimming
against public opinion here.
SMITH: A degree. But there are
a lot of irritating things in America. There are people who don't like
talking head talk shows. Horrible!
BEGALA: Lock them up, too.
SMITH:
But the fact is we don't have federal laws. Nuisance is part of a free
speech society. It's a society that recognizes that advertising and the
ability to reach people, even people who don't think they want to hear
what you have to say can be very useful. It breaks some of the
monopolies we've seen in the past. Without telemarketing would the
telephone deregulation have gone as far as it has? You have to find
some way to get the new person on the block.
And crazy Eddie
TVs and telemarketers are nuisances, they're irritating, they're
maddening, but they're part of the competitive process, part of free
speech, and we jeopardize our rights. Bounty hunters who basically are
going to get paid because they didn't essentially put your list on the
name right are really assuming that government knows how to list
manage. After 9/11, one of the things we found out, the government's
not all that good at list management. Indeed government lists have a
pretty sordid record in history. Do we really want another government
list where if they make mistakes, what will happen? They'll get a
bigger budget, a bigger agency, more power.
CARLSON: But
Mr. Bulmash, it seems to me that in your attacks on an entire industry,
what you're really attacking is the elderly, students, people who need
extra money, in short, telemarketers who are people, too. And
you're
going after them like they're not even human beings.
BULMASH:
And what about the elderly, the ill, the infirm at home, trying to
recover after a hospital stay with arthritis, with emphysema that can't
get to the phone. These telemarketers know before they make their
next
call that the most likely result of that call is going to serve only to
disturb the person called in their home.
CARLSON: Aren't they offering companionship, too?
BULMASH: Companionship?
CARLSON: Well, sure, they're calling to say, look...
BULMASH: They're a bacteria.
CARLSON: I'll talk to you. I'll listen to you as long as you like, I'm
here for you. That doesn't count?
SMITH: One of my families pointed out that a Smith would talk to a lamp
post. There are people who like the conversation.
BULMASH:
You know, there are hundreds of cigarette outlets in mini marts and
businesses throughout the country. What if all 100 million of
them
started calling all the phone numbers in our homes? I mean, we
would be
running to the phone like pavlovian dogs on an hourly basis, responding
to these nuisances.
SMITH: You've never taken your phone
off the hook like some of us have. You pick it up, you put it there it
beeps for five or ten sends.
BULMASH: And what about the emergency
calls? (CROSSTALK)
SMITH:
When I call my niece. When I call my niece, when I call my brother,
when I call CROSSFIRE. Why did they find out? They know it's me. They
can either answer or not. Maybe I'm an unwanted guest on your program.
BEGALA: Always answer to you.
SMITH:
Basically, look, we have technologies, and they're rapidly improving.
Rather than rush in with an FTC rule, incidentally, by a Republican
FTC, just shows the seductiveness of this city. Even conservatives come
here and get seduced in a matter of moments.
BEGALA: My
friend, Laurence, a brilliant professor of law at Stanford, reminded me
the other day that the word phony came from at the advent of the
telephone. Con artists and ripoff artists who called people up and
tried to fleece them. That's gotten so bad that I want to read you a
few strategies that another friend of mine came up with. This is one of
the most brilliant strategies from one of the most brilliant people I
know.
Some guy named Carlson wrote an essay recently. This is what he says to
telemarketers.
"Well
to tell you the truth, Brandon, I can't. I'm kind of busy. I am having
my other leg amputated in the morning. Got to pack for the hospital."
He
also told one, "I'm out on bond right now. Maybe you read about it. I
killed three people in a drug-related murder spree a couple of years
ago. I'm out now trying to beat the charges."
This is what people have been reduced to. Decent citizens having to
make up claims that they're murderers.
SMITH:
No, no, no. You missed it. What we're seeing in telemarketing now is a
creative outlet for the talented people like yourself who can come up
with those stories. We basically have to recognize that advertising is
not something we love all the time. But it is something that is
essential. It is essential to essentially a free society. It's the only
thing that breaks up a invested monopoly.
CARLSON: Mr.
Bulmash the name of your (UNINTELLIGIBLE) threat, "So You Want to Sue a
Telemarketer", you making some money on that by the way?
BULMASH: We sold thousands.
CARLSON: So somebody's profiting from telemarketing.
BULMASH: Our members have collected
over 1.7 million dollars since 1996 from telemarketers.
SMITH: Bounty hunters.
CARLSON:
But my question is to you, I assume, that you're telling people you
ought to sue a telemarketer. And isn't this exactly the kind of
frivolous lawsuit ties up the court from letting people file real
lawsuits?
BULMASH: What is frivolous about our
fundamental, human right to be left alone in our homes? What is
frivolous about that?
CARLSON:
You don't have that right, I not sure
if you noticed. You don't pay
your taxes, Mr. Bulmash and actually armed guys from the IRS come to
you and take you out of it and take your home away. You don't
have that
right in this country. Maybe in Venezuela, not here.
BULMASH:
I think you do have that right if you're following all the laws.
We
are, indeed, citizens of a country. Justice Louis Brandeis said
in 1890
that the right to be left alone is the most comprehensive of rights,
and the one most valued by civilized man. We've got an entire
industry
out there barging into our homes. This is not appropriate.
BEGALA:
There's a particularly odious practice in America, right. Citizens
don't like that practice, they petitioned their government for redress
of grievance, the government is acting on it to outlaw it, it's called
democracy.
SMITH: 64,000 people petitioned the FTC. There's 280 million Americans
who didn't petition the FTC.
BEGALA: 279 million of them hate these telemarketers.
SMITH:
They hate them, but they basically use them. And they use them because
one of the ways we learn about new telephone services, let's take other
areas. We're not going to try to regulate political callers yet. We are
not going to regulate charitable callers. But if I want to use a
professional to raise money for my organization that does get
regulated. When government starts filtering out the kind of people who
can call us, where do they stop? Are they going to start having laws
that families with small children can't have calls from adult.
CARLSON:
Robert Bulmash, we are almost out of
time. And I want to ask you about
cell phones. No telemarketer has called me yet on a cell
phone. Many
Americans, maybe most now have and use cell phones, many of them as
their primary phone. It kind of makes this argument we're having
almost
obsolete, doesn't it?
SMITH: In November of this year phone
numbers will become portable. You'll be able to transfer your land line
to your cell phone line and we're going to start getting telenuisance
calls on our cell phones. It's going to cost us money.
BULMASH: When we
talked about political calls, in the last election cycle, President
George W. -- or George II, he was making prerecorded telemarketing
calls, trying to get people out to get the vote out. Those calls
were
illegal, because they did not include an address or phone number as
required by the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
CARLSON: Do you think he's -- because of that do you think he's an
illegitimate president? What should be the penalty for that?
(CROSSTALK)
CARLSON: Mr. Bulmash is telling us
what the penalty is.
BULMASH:
The penalty is spelled out in the federal law: $500 per violation. If
he only called 20 percent of America's 100 million residential lines,
that means he would be in debt to about $5 billion if the state AGs
would go after him.
CARLSON: Well, on that note I want to wish
you luck collecting, Robert Bulmash and thank you for joining us. We
really appreciate it.
Fred Smith, thank you.
SMITH: My pleasure.